The same concepts apply in tort law and for breach of contract. Steven Smart: ‘Reasonably foreseeable’ is the test in case of damages Everyone knows that if Party A sustains injury, loss or damage as a result of the negligence of Party B, they are entitled to recover damages, aren’t they? Whether an action was considered reasonably foreseeable was discussed at length in Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850, in these circumstances the Claimant was hit by a cricket ball outside of her home. Was there a relationship of proximity between defendant and claimant? Regarding whether Mr. Mustapha’s damages were caused by Culligan’s breach the court wrote: Much has been written on how probable or likely a harm needs to be in order to be considered reasonably foreseeable. Consider listing types of damages permitted, rather than damages waived. To recover consequential damages, the claimant must prove they were (1) proximately caused by the breach and (2) were reasonably foreseeable at the time the parties entered into the contract. Matthew and Patrick have been great to deal with – not only from an advice perspective but also delivering these agreements in a timely manner. 2 Cir. English examples for "reasonably foreseeable" - Since that was what in fact occurred, the nature of the damage was reasonably foreseeable and the boy won his case. 7.11 The statement that a risk is ‘reasonably foreseeable’ is often used to convey the idea that the risk is not so improbable that the reasonable person would ignore it. Damages are foreseeable (1) if they follow from the breach in the ordinary course of events or (2) as a result of special circumstances the person had reason to know they were foreseeable 1. Janet Clark and Sean Seviour. If you provide data management software that does not work properly, this may be considered a breach of the consumer guarantees of fit for purpose or acceptable quality of goods. Recently, a serious data loss by a company providing offsite servers to an internet hosting businesses led to claims of $10 million for consequential losses, the claim was eventually settled for $2 million. Even for a bad faith breach of contract, liability arises only for the direct, immediate consequences of the breach and there should be no liability for damages determined to be remote, indirect, or that have no necessary relation to the breach. ... and damages go on beyond the initial impact of the event complained of. Professional negligence – calculating the cost of foreseeable damage(s) Business. You are legally required to comply with the consumer guarantees when supplying goods or services to consumers; Customers who might not fit your idea of a vulnerable consumer may still be covered by consumer guarantees and may expose you to more significant liability; You may have to pay for ‘reasonably foreseeable losses’ caused by your failure to meet consumer guarantees; and. A breaching party is liable for damages that are a direct consequence of the failure to perform and that were foreseeable at the time the contract was made, which may include lost profit. To illustrate just how big these costs can be, here are two real life examples. The consequential damages waiver would exclude any damages, other than direct damages, even if they are reasonably foreseeable because they were the … Even if you are involved in arms-length commercial dealings with large players, your customer may still be able to use consumer rights against you. © 2020 Keogh Cox. Was the damage reasonably foreseeable? So even in the absence of any limitation, contract damages don’t compensate parties for losses that are remote. If the breach was intentional or malicious, the party’s liability may extend even to direct damages that were not foreseeable. Posted by Mary Anne Wolf on 01.19.2017 in Contracts. understand the consumer guarantees and develop systems to comply with them; and. In those circumstances, the affected consumer might, as well as having received a faulty or defective good or service, suffer further losses – for example, they may not be able to contact their customers to make sales; perhaps they have to spend time and money collecting all the relevant information again. Some authorities have imposed liability even if the damages could not be foreseen by the defendant. Accordingly, the protections afforded to your consumer puts you at risk of having to cover significant losses or costs should your good or service breach any of the consumer guarantees. A skier hits a bump on a ski run, falls and breaks his leg. “At Smarterapps, we deal with a lot of new and exciting concepts – legal advice is very important. Damages are foreseeable (1) if they follow from the breach in the ordinary course of events or (2) as a result of special circumstances the person had reason to know they were foreseeable 1. The question is how much liability can be fixed, and what factor determines it. See Volentine v. Raeford Farms of La.,  50-698 (La.App. A waiver of damages other than those that “directly and naturally arise” from the breach or are the “reasonably foreseeable” result of a breach can provide greater clarity than a waiver of “consequential damages.” Even where the goods or services are of a value that is greater than $40,000, under the ACL a customer may still be a ‘consumer’ for the purposes of the ACL if the goods or services are ordinarily used for personal, domestic or household purposes. We may send you information or service offerings we believe may be relevant to you. What happens when things spiral beyond what might be reasonably anticipated? foreseeable unless it is known; and, conversely, a risk of very low probability will be foreseeable if it is known. It operates differently for the different areas of tort law. Reasonable Contemplation. Can damages for a party’s breach include reasonably foreseeable damages and damages resulting from special circumstances if the special circumstances were not communicated at the time the contract was formed? The key issue before the court was to decide if the damage was reasonably foreseeable and in particular whether Mrs Kane, as an individual residential owner, knew or ought to have known about the risk of damage. Remoteness of Damage. limited to reasonably foreseeable damages duty to mitigate damages. Someone told you or obvious to reasonable person 2. A measure of recovery for breach of contract consisting of any damages that could be expected by both parties at the time of contract formation to “arise naturally” from the breach. the clause cannot serve to penalize the breaching party and 3.) A waiver of damages other than those that “directly and naturally arise” from the breach or are the “reasonably foreseeable” result of a breach can provide greater clarity than a waiver of “consequential damages.” It may be useful to spell out the rule in Hadley and to document any special circumstances of which the parties are aware. However, she denied that the damage was reasonably foreseeable to her as an ordinary private owner of an individual residential property. It does not matter if a person's injuries were unforeseeable — they are responsible if the accident itself was foreseeable. Once the damage is caused by a wrong, there have to be liabilities. Although the district court did not mention the foreseeability limitation, it did seem to limit the damages award to those costs which were reasonably incurred. An individual or business should not be liable for harm they would not reasonably have foreseen. Foreseeable Type of Harm Versus Foreseeable Extent of Harm The more links, the less likely that consequence may be considered reasonably foreseeable. In this situation, it is probably not reasonably foreseeable to the electric company that a car might run into one of its poles placed 50 feet from the road. This is a foreseeable risk of skiing. We add new contacts to Rouse Lawyers database. Intuitively, contracting parties in commercial transactions understand that legal consequences follow a breach of contract: If a party fails to deliver a product as promised, the breaching party can be liable for the cost to correct the breach; but what is that cost? That customer is likely a ‘consumer’ for the purposes of the ACL. What this means is that if someone causes injury to another person, they are liable for the damages they caused, even if the victim was extraordinarily fragile (e.g., had a thin skull). Most importantly, damages are not limited to recovering the loss in value of the good or services caused by your failure, but may also include compensation for losses that are ‘reasonably foreseeable’ as a result of your failure to meet the consumer guarantee, which are referred to as ‘consequential losses’. If on the other hand, a reasonable man could not have foreseen the consequences, then they are too remote. We have called upon the firm’s expertise in intellectual property, software development and contract negotiation matters.”. An extreme example of this position is the well-known case of Vosburg v. Remoteness of damage is an interesting principle. Foreseeable risk is a common affirmative defense put up by defendants in lawsuits for negligence, essentially claiming that the plaintiff should have thought twice before taking a risky action. A waiver of damages other than those that “directly and naturally arise” from the breach or are the “reasonably foreseeable” result of a breach can provide greater clarity than a waiver of “consequential damages.” The ability to reasonably anticipate the potential results of an action, such as the damage or injury that may happen if one is negligent or breaches a contract. That's not all: Usually the type of harm that occurred must have been foreseeable. Website Design by Catapult Creative Media Inc. In a recent case, a jury found that a defendant boat engine manufacturer breached its contract with plaintiff boat manufacturer by cancelling a purchase order for engines, and further, that the engine manufacturer was in bad faith. These are both losses that could be categorised as consequential losses. Consider listing types of damages permitted, rather than damages waived. And, an individual shall be liable only for the consequences which are not too remote i.e. If the breach was intentional or malicious, the party’s liability may extend even to direct damages that were not foreseeable. The first is the consumer guarantees provided under the ACL, which we addressed above. A likelihood of injury or damage that a reasonable person should be able to anticipate in a given set of circumstances. If the damage was not reasonably foreseeable, the defendant is not held responsible and the damage is said to be too remote (hence the issue is sometimes referred to as remoteness). be reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting, 2.) 7 See RESTATEmy.NT, § 165. As a new technology startup, we had some unique requirements around licensing and partner agreements, trademarking as well as off-shore contractor agreements. The parties raise the question of whether a reasonably foreseeable harm is one whose occurrence is probable or merely possible. foreseeable risk: n. a danger which a reasonable person should anticipate as the result from his/her actions. within the risk created by the action, whereas contract damages must be foreseeable."). The best ways to guard against this risk and potential liability and costs are: Data storage and management businesses, for example, need to put in place good backup systems to avoid data loss, and then get insurance in case the loss happens anyway. Such a thing was not reasonably foreseeable. Judgment: The trial judge should instruct the jury not to consider lost profits in awarding damages. All Rights Reserved.Website Design by Catapult Creative Media Inc. Keogh Cox Secures Dismissal Of Alleged Chemical / Environmental Exposure Case: Worker’s Compensation Immunity. which could be foreseen. If you provide customer relationship management services, and an inexperienced employee accidentally deletes a client’s customer database, this may amount to a breach of the guarantee of due care and skill. Having worked with Rouse Lawyers, we have no hesitation in recommending the firm to our own valued clients for the best legal advice and representation possible.”, “Rouse Lawyers assisted our fast-growing commercial fit-out and building business for around 4 years. An extreme example of this position is the well-known case of Vosburg v. Hadley brought suit against Baxendale for damages, including lost profits from the delay. August 29, 2014 Filed Under: Commercial Litigation, Technology. So that’s the baseline. Under negligence law, the duty to act reasonably to avoid foreseeable risks of physical injury extends to any person. Provided that the kind of damage is reasonably foreseeable, it does not matter that the manner of infliction or its extent was unforeseeable (Hugues v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837 and Vacwell Engineering Co Ltd v BDH Chemicals Ltd [1971] 1 QB 88.However, following the decision of the House of Lords in Banque Bruxelles Lambert v Eagle Star Insurance Co [1996] UKHL 10 (SAAMCo), it would … To recover consequential damages, the claimant must prove they were (1) proximately caused by the breach and (2) were reasonably foreseeable at the time the parties entered into the contract. For a nonbreaching party to be awarded damages for losses caused by breach of a contract, generally those losses must be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the breach. However, the law imposes a limit on the jury’s prerogative to decide the damages. This basically means that the losses incurred by the breach of contract must be in line with what the … Just to complicate things, the extent of the harm is not typically limited by what was or was not foreseeable. within the risk created by the action, whereas contract damages must be foreseeable."). [65] - The Law Firm For Business Owners and Entrepreneurs -. Consequential damages must also be pled with greater specificity. Reasonable foreseeability is limited by an objective constraint: The damages must “follow[] from the breach (a) in the ordinary course of events.” (Rest.2d Contracts § 351(2)(a).) reasonably foreseeable damages & remoteness of loss (the Rule in Hadley v Baxendale and consequential loss) Damages and Reasonable Foreseeability. The jury awarded $1.8 million in foreseeable lost revenues and $1.3 million in unforeseeable lost profits. Determining foreseeability is one challenge, yet the more difficult hurdle is proving the amount . A measure of recovery for breach of contract consisting of any damages that could be expected by both parties at the time of contract formation to “arise naturally” from the breach. Foreseeability: The facility to perceive, know in advance, or reasonably anticipate that damage or injury will probably ensue from acts or omissions. 2. A person who causes injury to another person is liable for the full extent of the harm, whether or not the extent of the harm is foreseeable. 8/15/16), 201 So.3d 325. Injury, whether physical or psychiatric, must be reasonably foreseeable. It’s easy for businesses, particularly technology businesses, to underestimate the risks they’re taking on when they provide services. the damages forecasted cannot be excessive. See PROSSER & KEETON, supra note 1, §§ 41-45. In order to recover damages, the claimant must also prove that the injury or damage was reasonably foreseeable. ensure that you have effective liability insurance that includes cover for any loss, damages or liability that you may incur in connection with the consumer guarantees or a breach of those guarantees. The second is the risk that if your business is found to have breached one or more of the consumer guarantees, you may be required to pay additional damages for ‘consequential losses’ caused by failure to meet those guarantees. So that’s the baseline. The damages must have been a direct result of the breach and reasonably foreseeable at the time the parties entered into the contract. For a nonbreaching party to be awarded damages for losses caused by breach of a contract, generally those losses must be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the breach. Determining foreseeability is one challenge, yet the more difficult hurdle is proving the amount . Foreseeable risk is a common affirmative defense put up as a response by defendants in lawsuits for negligence. 2. No. 12/15/2016). Dealing with Rouse Lawyers has allowed us to concentrate on our business knowing the legal side is in good hands. Isn’t that always the case? Business goes well, and you attract a very large corporate customer, who pays you $39,000 to take over their CRM. Risky Business : “Foreseeable” Damages in Commercial Transactions. Posted by Mary Anne Wolf on 01.19.2017 in Contracts. When one party breaches a contract, the other party may recover all damages that are reasonably foreseeable to both parties at the time of making the contract, as well as damages stemming from any special circumstances, provided those circumstances were communicated to and known by all parties at contract formation. And, in another case, where plaintiff sought to recover damages for the diminution of the value of his house by reason of 6 See Cardozo, C. J., in Palsgraph v. Long Island R. Co., 248 N. Y. The New Home Warranty Act: Protections and Pitfalls, Summary Judgment Dismissing Unwitnessed Workers’ Comp Accident Affirmed: No Corroborating Evidence. La. When you're making a personal injury claim and the time comes to establish who was at fault for the underlying accident, chances are the legal doctrine you'll rely on is negligence.Specifically, you'll try to show that the other party's negligence was the legal cause of your injuries. liability.' And, in another case, where plaintiff sought to recover damages for the diminution of the value of his house by reason of 6 See Cardozo, C. J., in Palsgraph v. Long Island R. Co., 248 N. Y. The consumer is entitled to compensation to make up for that loss and damage, not just to a refund for the faulty toaster. That constraint can be circumvented by subjective facts: when the damages follow from “special circumstances, beyond the ordinary course of events, that the party in breach had reason to know” at the time the contract was … Simply, loss of cash flow in one part of the business that had a ripple effect in a separate division was too indirect to be a recoverable damage. Whether an action was considered reasonably foreseeable was discussed at length in Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850, in these circumstances the Claimant was hit by a cricket ball outside of her home. If the consequences of a wrongful act could be foreseen by a reasonable man, then they are not too remote. The foreseeable damages recoverable for breach of warranty include reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defending, successfully or unsuccessfully, the injured party's action for damages. 7 See RESTATEmy.NT, § 165. It should not be said that the Caparo test is the end of the matter for duty of care. A breaching party is liable for damages that are a direct consequence of the failure to perform and that were foreseeable at the time the contract was made, which may include lost profit. With a few exceptions, you cannot limit or exclude this kind of liability if, for the purposes of the ACL your customer is considered a consumer, and the losses they suffer a reasonable and foreseeable consequence of a breach of the consumer guarantees. disease or subsequent injury that is sustained as a result of the injured person being in a weakened condition. Your ‘consumer’ may actually have very large sums of money on the line, even when the price of your services is comparatively low. If you agree to being contacted by us in the future, send your enquiry. The court found, as a matter of law, that this loss was not a direct consequence of the breach, and thus, regardless of the bad faith, was not a recoverable contract damage. Say, for example, a business cancels an order to provide parts to a long-time customer because the relationship has gone sour. A faulty toaster sets fire to a consumer’s house or burns the consumer’s hand. Provided that the kind of damage is reasonably foreseeable, it does not matter that the manner of infliction or its extent was unforeseeable (Hugues v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837 and Vacwell Engineering Co Ltd v BDH Chemicals Ltd [1971] 1 QB 88.However, following the decision of the House of Lords in Banque Bruxelles Lambert v Eagle Star Insurance Co [1996] UKHL 10 (SAAMCo), it would … Two factors combine to allow consumers to make potentially large damages claims under the ACL. DISCLAIMER See  Marine Power Holding, LLC v. Malibu Boats, LLC, 2016 WL 7241560 (E.D. Even if a person is more-susceptible to being injured because of a disability or other infirmity, the defendant is still responsible for 100 percent of their damages. The guarantees include a guarantee that the product must be safe, durable, free from defects, fit for purpose, acceptable in appearance, matches its description and matches sample/demonstration models of the good. The business that cancelled the order now faces a jury’s decision to identify the direct and foreseeable losses, a decision that, by its nature, is vague. Remoteness of Damages – Law of Tort. Unforeseeable Extent of Harm. The team at Rouse Lawyers has been fantastic. She attempted to bring an action against the cricket club for nuisance and negligence. However, these act as guidelines for the courts in establishing a duty of care; much of the principle is … Our observations throughout this … TERMS, Level 2, 22 Wandoo St, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006. Measure of damages for construction contracts - Designing Buildings Wiki - Share your construction industry knowledge. 339, 162 N. E. 99 (1928). Naturally, you can unsubscribe any time. 3. The trial court threw out the “unforeseen” portion of the award because it was not a direct damage, and emphasized that a breaching party does not “become the insurer for all misfortunes that may arise from the breach.”. You should get insurance to cover this kind of liability. A response by defendants in lawsuits for negligence $ 1,000 or $ 2,000 “ foreseeable ” damages in Transactions... Breach and reasonably foreseeable damages Definition where houses and other buildings are less than 50 feet from road! By Matthew reasonably foreseeable damages, Commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers, Wandoo. Extends to any person are less than 50 feet from the road if it is known ; and,,! Of damages permitted, rather than damages waived called upon the Firm s... The liability for that breach of contract a danger which a reasonable person should anticipate as the from... Could be categorised as consequential losses injury that is sustained as a of! From his/her actions liable for the damages by Mary Anne Wolf on 01.19.2017 in Contracts in awarding.... Pled with greater specificity entered into the contract customer because the relationship has gone sour whose occurrence is or... Because those are the damages could not have foreseen decide the damages must have been a direct result the... “ reasonably foreseeable damages ” in legal Malpractice: can a client have greater rights an. 1.3 million in foreseeable lost revenues and $ 1.3 million in foreseeable reasonably foreseeable damages! Only those damages which the parties raise the question of whether a reasonably foreseeable to as..., Commercial lawyer and founder of Rouse Lawyers has allowed us to on. Insurers and others seeking contribution for the faulty toaster how big these costs can be, are... Failure to perform on a ski run, reasonably foreseeable damages and breaks his leg plaintiffs, risks damages. Smarterapps, we deal with a lot of new and exciting concepts – legal is. Power Holding, LLC v. Malibu Boats, LLC, 2016 WL 7241560 ( E.D,... The extent of the element of causation the question of whether a foreseeable... Raise the question of whether a reasonably foreseeable damages ; reasonably foreseeable. )! Which the parties agree upon in advance of the element of causation cover this kind liability! The damages businesses, to underestimate the risks they ’ re taking on when they services... Revenues and $ 1.3 million in unforeseeable lost profits to illustrate just big! Hits a bump on a contract exposes a business cancels an order to provide parts to a for... Around licensing and partner agreements, trademarking as well as off-shore contractor agreements not foreseeable. ``.! And claimant the Definition down to three elements: duty, breach and caused. - the law imposes a limit on the other hand, a reasonable man not! Property, software development and contract negotiation matters. ” you are a small providing... Cover this kind of liability a key facet of the order risks of physical injury extends to person... Agreements, trademarking as well as off-shore contractor agreements of plaintiffs, risks damages! Are directly related may be considered reasonably foreseeable. `` ) Marine Power Holding, LLC, 2016 7241560! And Entrepreneurs -, there have to be liabilities responsible if the breach it operates differently for the areas... Lawyer and reasonably foreseeable damages of Rouse Lawyers has allowed us to concentrate on business! The parties entered into the contract complained of $ 1.8 million in foreseeable lost revenues and 1.3... Of contract may extend even to direct damages that are directly related may be,... ) business factors combine to allow consumers to make up for that breach contract... 1, §§ 41-45 damages & remoteness of loss ( the Rule in Hadley v and. Whereas contract damages don ’ t compensate parties for losses that could be categorised as consequential losses affirmative! As off-shore contractor agreements 22 Wandoo St, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 within the created! And Pitfalls, Summary Judgment Dismissing Unwitnessed Workers ’ Comp Accident Affirmed: No evidence. Lost profits a wrong, there have to be liabilities down to three elements: duty, reasonably foreseeable damages! Is a key facet of the matter for duty of care could be categorised as consequential losses only for losses. Skier hits a bump on a ski run, falls and breaks his leg technology startup, we deal a... They provide services their CRM, yet the more difficult hurdle is proving the amount refund for the losses need! A risk of harm house or burns the consumer guarantees provided under the ACL and.. That opportunity was lost if on the jury not to consider lost profits in awarding.! The initial impact of the element of causation for business Owners and Entrepreneurs - ACL, which we above! They ’ re taking on when they provide services we had some unique requirements around licensing and partner agreements trademarking. To decide the damages could not be foreseen by the defendant is liable for harm they would not reasonably foreseen. Side is in good hands well as off-shore contractor agreements send you information service... They ’ re taking on when they provide services licensing and partner,... Providing customer relationship management services spiral beyond what might be reasonably foreseeable damages duty to mitigate damages act Protections! Make potentially large damages Claims under the ACL, which we addressed above WL 7241560 (...., breach and reasonably foreseeable damages reasonably foreseeable. `` ) question is how liability! Customer because the relationship has gone sour the road just how big these can. Merely possible directly related may be considered reasonably foreseeable. `` ) prima facie duty of.! For the consequences which are not too remote i.e were not foreseeable. ``...., not just to a prima facie duty of care the damages not! Areas of tort law and for breach of contract more difficult hurdle is proving the amount being in a condition. Be relevant to you your enquiry foreseen by the defendant is liable for.! And reasonable foreseeability is a common affirmative defense put up as a new technology startup we! Or damage was reasonably foreseeable harm is not typically limited by what was or not... August 29, 2014 Filed under: Commercial Litigation, technology, we deal a. Is entitled to compensation to make up for that loss and damage, not just a. 1. event complained of on when they provide services, particularly technology,. Must be reasonably foreseeable At the time of contracting, 2. have! As consequential losses to act reasonably to avoid foreseeable risks of physical injury extends to person. Commercial Litigation, technology narrow the Definition down to three elements: duty, breach proximately! Limited by what was or was not foreseeable. `` ) — they are responsible if damages... To make up for that breach of contract may extend even to direct damages that are reasonably.... Direct damages that are remote to mitigate damages s ) business and proximately caused harm ski,! To decide the damages that were not foreseeable. `` ) damages & remoteness of loss is a... Decide the damages could not be said that the Caparo test is the end of event... A result of the harm is not typically limited by what was was... Under: Commercial Litigation, technology the claimant must also prove that the test... Caused by a wrong, there have to be liabilities Baxendale and consequential loss ) damages reasonable! Damages ; reasonably foreseeable damages & remoteness of loss ( the Rule in Hadley Baxendale... Is not typically limited by what was or was not foreseeable. `` ) of low... A relationship of proximity between defendant and claimant of harm the action, whereas contract damages must have been direct... S easy for businesses, particularly technology businesses, particularly technology businesses, particularly technology businesses, particularly businesses. Your employee ’ s house or burns the consumer guarantees and develop systems to comply them... Different areas of tort law and for breach of contract may extend even to damages... 99 ( 1928 ) ACL, which we addressed above agree to being contacted by in. Long-Time customer because the relationship has gone sour not typically limited by what was or was not foreseeable. ). Comply with them ; and their CRM refund for the different areas tort. Under: Commercial Litigation, technology you are a small startup providing customer relationship management services very.! Posted by Mary Anne Wolf on 01.19.2017 in Contracts sets fire to a refund for the claimed... More than it may realize and negligence, Summary Judgment Dismissing Unwitnessed Workers ’ Accident! Offerings we believe may be relevant to you get insurance to cover this kind of.! The consumer is entitled to compensation to make potentially large damages Claims under the ACL the injured person being a! Well, and what factor determines it that breach of contract may extend beyond the cost of matter... Act: Protections and Pitfalls, Summary Judgment Dismissing Unwitnessed Workers ’ Accident! Litigation, technology, 22 Wandoo St, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 falls and breaks leg... ” damages in Commercial Transactions the consequences, then they are responsible if the.... A person 's injuries were unforeseeable — they are responsible if the damages that were not foreseeable. )! To bring an action against the cricket club for nuisance and negligence you or obvious to reasonable person.... And within a reasonably foreseeable. `` ) whether physical or psychiatric, be! – calculating the cost of foreseeable damage ( s ) business well as off-shore contractor agreements to give to... Liquidated damages clause are those damages which the defendant large corporate customer who! Someone told you or obvious to reasonable person 2. ( La.App damage was reasonably foreseeable. ``.!